The decision of the UK Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2025] is one that has generated a rapid response, from the photos of those celebrating the decision on the steps of ...

When wealthy landowners, Alexander and Diana Darwall, sued a national park authority to stop people pitching their tents […] ...

On 23 May 2025, the Court of Appeal held that the Conservative Party was not exercising a ‘public function’ for the purposes of s 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 when it elected Liz Truss as party ...

Panel Discussion on the ‘Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill’ 18:00-19:30 Monday 24th February 2025 University of […] ...

Recent Posts Dane Luo: There is ‘Advice’ and then there is ‘advice’: The Constitutional Conventions on the Appointment of the Prime Minister Event: A Parliamentarian’s Guide to the Unwritten ...

In the United Kingdom, the mental health of politicians has traditionally commanded relatively little attention, perhaps due to […] ...

In For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers the UK Supreme Court rejected the contention that possession of […] ...

In For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers the UK Supreme Court rejected the contention that possession of […] ...

Call for Guest Editors of Public Law’s Annual Themed Analysis Section (2026): The Editorial Committee of Public Law […] ...

Last week Liz Truss’s cabinet decided to shelve the proposed British Bill of Rights. Quite a lot has […] ...