United States v. Nixon Federal appropriations rider did not preclude probation condition barring California defendant's use of medical marijuana (per curiam) October 17, 2016 at 03:38 PM. X.

United States (1971), New York Times co-counsel Floyd Abrams and attorney Ted Olson talked about President Nixon's reaction to… In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v.

Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. United States would have given Nixon immunity for Watergate crimes — but 50 years ago he needed a presidential pardon to avoid prison.

A response to the claim that President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh wants to overrule United States v. Nixon.

On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled in U.S. v. Nixon that the 37th president, Richard M. Nixon, could not exert executive privilege over White House ...

United States v. Nixon Federal appropriations rider did not preclude probation condition barring California defendant's use of medical marijuana (per curiam) October 17, 2016 at 03:38 PM. X.

In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), New York Times co-counsel Floyd Abrams and attorney Ted Olson talked about President Nixon's reaction to the ...

Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. United States would have given Nixon immunity for Watergate crimes — but 50 years ago he needed a presidential pardon to avoid prison.

Under Trump v. United States, Nixon wouldn’t have had to worry about a pardon. He could have explained away all of these crimes as “official acts” he took using the powers of the presidency.