News

Bible-buying habits keep it a bestseller, but is it actually read? Here's a look at why many Americans purchase but don't read their Bibles.
In 1965, the two intellectual giants squared off in a debate at Cambridge. It didn’t go quite as Buckley hoped.
An original King James Bible is one of only a small number of 1611 editions left in the world. Lexington Herald-Leader On Thursday, as had long been expected, a bill was introduced to read verses ...
Meanwhile, William Tyndale's 1526 Bible was the first English version that was translated from the Bible's original languages ... After the Tyndale Bible, the King James Bible followed in 1611 ...
Modern Bible versions now insert speech marks, but these did not exist in the King James Version, and so using red letters ... There was no punctuation or speech marks in the original Greek. Where to ...
The original settlement had begun as a ... that the world famous ‘King James Version’ of the Bible was born. Over the years the building gained a porch; a sailors’ loft; galleries decorated ...
His Bible — a King James Version passed down from his maternal ... would promote Christian nationalism prompted the Bibles’ original publisher to withhold them. Eventually, a new publisher ...
King James Bible On 24 March 1603, King James VI of Scotland was also ... James was told that existing translations of the Bible were “corrupt and not answerable to the truth of the original”. What ...
but one that would maintain the "purity and stylistic beauty of the original King James," according to the publisher. Thomas Nelson promotes this Bible version as being faithful to the original Greek, ...
Walters wrote that he wanted the Bible referenced as a historical document ... is a modernization of the original King James Version of 1611. Both publications use the same underlying Greek text for ...
However, whilst it is the most widely recognised version of the Bible today, the King James version is by no means the first translation of the original biblical texts. John Wycliffe, the English lay ...
This is an article that was published in the 1800s, and is a good starting place. The original King James Bible did contain the Apocrypha, which those translators specifically stated (even though they ...