Despite judges blocking President Donald Trump’s punishments, experts say firms may still worry about being targeted if they ...

What's the cost? L.A. is paying the firm $900,000 for a two-year contract, according to publicly available online records.

The lawsuit alleged unjust enrichment and breach of contract, accusing Posner—who served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

Experts discussed the differing approaches of France, England and Singapore to issues in arbitration, why this difference in ...

GRSM’s Construction Group is pleased to publish the latest issue of our Construction Law Update, a quarterly take on trends ...

Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher has handled major cases around the country, including last year when the firm represented the city ...

There are at least three active supplier disputes, two involving Stellantis, seeking clarity on the legality of contract ...

Embracing a growth mindset may be challenging, but doing so can help law departments successfully manage the increasing ...

Federal courts have handed a series of resounding victories to the law firms fighting back against President Trump’s targeted executive orders, a sharp rebuke of his retribution campaign against ...

After firms struck deals to avoid punitive executive orders, some big clients decided to take their business elsewhere.

Top-performing law firms recognize that sales is a specific skill set. They don't lump sales in with customer service.

In light of the precedent established by the case, Konstantinidis elaborated on how both dispute and transactional lawyers can leverage the decision when advising their clients, given its broad ...