Mathematicians have been enthralled with artificial intelligence that can solve difficult math problems. And some developers ...

Anthropic's Claude 4 models show particular strength in coding and reasoning tasks, but lag behind in multimodality and ...

This was because OpenAI's benchmark claimed a 25% score, but when tested by another company, they found that the o3 model can only answer 10% of FrontierMath problems. OpenAI is only one of the ...

Making the situation worse, several benchmarks, most notably FrontierMath and Chatbot Arena, have recently come under heat for an alleged lack of transparency. Nevertheless, benchmarks still play ...

The challenges faced by LM Arena are not isolated. Other benchmarks, such as Frontier Math and ARC AGI, have also been criticized for similar shortcomings. These issues highlight systemic problems ...

When OpenAI unveiled o3 in December, the company claimed the model could answer just over a fourth of questions on FrontierMath, a challenging set of math problems. That score blew the competition ...

OpenAI’s o3: AI Benchmark Discrepancy Reveals Gaps in Performance Claims Your email has been sent The FrontierMath benchmark from Epoch AI tests generative models on difficult math problems.

At the time of its introduction, o3 was stated to come with the ability to solve more than 25% of questions on FrontierMath, a dataset designed to test complex mathematical reasoning. This ...

The company made significant claims about the capabilities of its o3 model, which it company unveiled last year, including its power to solve more complex math problems from FrontierMath and more.