To cover the Supreme Court these days is to catalogue its lawlessness. The conservative justices’ latest decision in McMahon ...

While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...

Mark Joseph Stern: Under federal law, Trump cannot remove Powell over a policy disagreement. Federal law expressly allows for ...

The Roberts Court has asked for reargument in a key redistricting case, a move that strongly suggests the conservative ...

NPR's Steve Inskeep speaks with Georgetown University law professor Stephen Vladeck about a recent pattern within the Supreme Court majority: issuing rulings with no written opinion.

In their decision allowing the Trump administration to dismantle the Department of Education, the justices didn’t offer one ...

Without explanation, the majority blocked lower court orders halting President Trump’s dismantling of the Department of ...

By a two-to-one margin, the public believes justices prioritize politics over the law. That's a disaster for the Supreme ...

In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.

"The President must take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not set out to dismantle them," Sotomayor wrote.