We’ve lost Justice Antonin Scalia, the conservative lion of ... on what reasonable infringements on the right to keep and bear arms are. The Supreme Court will need to, sooner or later, resolve ...

In a sweeping and masterful opinion, Scalia systematically presented and analyzed the evidence that established — to my mind conclusively — that the “right to keep and bear arms” was an ...

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says the Constitution’s right to bear arms isn’t absolute and could be changed in the future. Scalia, a card-carrying conservative and ...

The government spends hundreds of billions of dollars annually just to watch and follow us. Who authorized this?

Then-Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in a 2010 photo. (KEVIN LAMARQUE/REUTERS) Dennis Baron is a professor of English and linguistics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. For most ...

This provision references both the collective right of a militia ... Based on the limited data set Scalia considered, we can’t say his linguistic claim about bear arms against was unsupported ...

But even if Justice Scalia were right, he made it clear that the right to keep and bear arms was not categorical, but could be circumscribed in order to protect the public interest in health and ...

In that majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the individual right to bear arms was not unlimited and has restrictions: “We do not read the Second Amendment to protect the right of ...

When it comes to the “right to bear arms,” which the Second Amendment ... Heller, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia. The case was brought by one Dick Heller, a police officer who wanted ...

Amid today's heated debates about gun laws and the Second Amendment, what many people may not realize is that the phrase "the right to keep and to bear arms" is older than the Bill of Rights.