People use the term “theistic” in front of “evolution” to differentiate it from “naturalism,” but I do not understand why anyone—especially a Christian—fears natural explanations.

Just to be clear on a few definitions, the “Theistic Evolution” I am talking of is the view that regards religious teachings about a theistic deity as compatible with modern scientific understanding ...

But ‘theistic evolution’ isn’t one of their answers, at least not among the serious scientists I know who are theists. And it’s well past its sell-by date. Follow me on Facebook and Twitter.

Theistic evolution fails because it forces a choice between the Bible and science. This gives humans the job of choosing what is true and what is false.

His book, "The Language of God," about DNA, sees no conflict between belief in God as creator and the science of evolution, as long as we are speaking of Theistic Evolution (TE).

Theistic Evolution Is Redundant – Stacy Trasancos Ph.D., One Faith Pope Judging 101 – Pete Socks, Catholic Stand Catholic Children’s Choirs – Charles Cole, New Liturgical Movement ...

Not true. The purpose of evolution, if you will, is more evolution. 4. The common claim that it’s “just a theory” implies that it’s some kind of speculation. In fact it is a scientific theory.

Evolution is fully autonomous process that does not require any guiding “rationality” (Benedict’s term) to function. It’s an agonizingly slow, brutish, and insanely methodical process, but ...

Theistic evolution or God-guided evolution on the other hand means all things in the universe evolved over time under the guidance of God. Within theistic evolution there are two schools of thought.

These "theistic scientists" have advanced degrees from major institutions, often hold positions in higher education, and are typically more knowledgeable, more articulate and more savvy than old ...